| |
"Working at night
is totally different from anything you've done before," maintains
Tony Bodway, crew superintendent for Payne and Dolan Inc., a paving
operation in Waukesha, WI. "Until you do it, you can't fathom
working at night."
Rick Longstaff, president
of Vista Training Inc. in Burlington, WI, agrees. "Crews working
at night are usually under a tight schedule. They have to be able
to produce a certain amount of work in a specific amount of time.
There's glare from the artificial light, which leads to issues
like not being able to see dust and smoke and equipment coming at
you. How a contractor maneuvers both people and equipment in a light-versus-dark
scenario involves issues of both safety and productivity."
"It scary out there
at night," admits Jack Murphy, vice president of construction
for Conti Enterprises Inc. in South Plainfield, NJ. "You can't
just walk out there and not be prepared. Night work is more prevalent
everywhere, and one of the reasons is that it minimizes impacts
on the public."
 |
Russell Hutchison, director
of product safety and technical services for the Association of
Equipment Manufacturers, thinks the construction industry will see
more night work, especially on road and highway contracts. "We're
falling farther and farther behind with regard to the construction
and restoration of our highways," explains Hutchison, "while
at the same time, the use of those highways have increased dramatically.
We can't just shut down the roads when we want to work." The
Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America traces the current
trend to the 1998 Transportation Equity Act (now coming up for renewal),
which allocated funds to repair bridges and roadways and correct
hazardous road conditions, but Murphy thinks night work is more
widespread. "Night work is part of the culture of our company
because it's cost-effective," he points out. "When the
equipment's parked, it's still eating, so it just makes more sense
to run two shifts." Jack Lockwood of Allmand Brothers Inc.
in Holdrege, NE, agrees that economics will continue to drive night
construction. "Someone owns a piece of property and plans to
build, let's say, a shopping center. He's made a huge investment
and he wants to get it working for him as soon as possible. This
means contractors are working around the clock."
Night work is here to
stay. The challenge is how to work safely and effectively under
lights.
So What's the
Problem?
"When you go into
night mode, right away you have a different kind of equipment,"
observes Bodway. "You have to have personal equipment like
safety vests, obviously, but you also have lights and whatever it
takes to set up those lights and get them running."
"Quality is a big
issue," states Murphy, "especially when there are penalties.
We did our runway work up at Newark airport almost all at night,
and they didn't tell us we could slack off because it was night
work. There's no question delivering good-quality work is tougher
at night."
"The time crews
can work at night is often compressed," continues Longstaff,
"and many times everything in the work zone has to be put back
to normal at a specified time, and this often leads to rushing.
Which is why people working at night need to work smart. One of
the key areas we're concerned about in our training materials
is visibility, given the glare and dark spots from night lighting.
During the day, for example, you can see a cloud of dust coming
at you, and at the least you can avoid particulate matter from going
into your eyes and nose by turning or moving out of the way."
Jerry Woodson of J.J. Keller & Associates, a safety equipment
supplier in Neenah, WI, suggests that crews who work under lights
are at additional risk from the particular hazards of jobs that
tend to be done at night, including silica dust from breaking up
concrete and asphalt and paint fumes.
A further challenge of
night work is that contractors working on or near roadways are responsible
for traffic control in and around the work zone (defined roughly
as the area between the first warning sign and the last traffic
control device), including signage that alerts motorists and directs
detours, as well as setting up cones, barrels, and protective barriers
to separate the public from workers and their equipment. AGC cites
figures common in the industry that some 1,200 people were killed
in construction zones in 2000, a significant jump over the 870 lives
lost the year before, and that some 100-150 of these were construction
workers. Data summarized on J.J. Keller's Web site (www.jjkeller.com)
suggest these deaths and the 20,000 injuries that occur annually
are related in part to inadequately developed and enforced safety
procedures. Notably half of the annual deaths are caused by equipment
and vehicles operating in and around job sites.
"There are an awful
lot of incidents out there involving people and machines,"
reports Bill Powell, marketing manager for Preco in Boise, ID, "even
though the machines are equipped with back-up alarms. When you're
working at night, there are a lot more distractions and a lot of
things you have to compensate forboth for equipment operators
and the crews working around them. In many cases, the operator can't
see, and the idea always has been that people will get out of the
way when they hear a back-up alarm. But what we find is that some
folks are ignoring the alarms and people are getting hit because
they're not paying attention." Which leads to the issue
cited by industry insiders as the most difficult challenge, what
human resources experts call "human factors."
"The most significant
issue about working at night is the social impact on the crews doing
the job," offers Murphy. "They may have logistical problems
like getting their children to daycare, but by far one of the biggest
problems is that the guys who work at night are not getting the
proper rest. Not only is this unsafe, but it also means I'm
not going to get a whole lot of productivity out of them."
"You've got
the question of whether people working the second and third shift
are alert," agrees Hutchison, who notes that there has been
an increased dialogue among equipment manufacturers about providing
additional safety equipment for nighttime conditions. "The
stress factor is huge," states Brian Deery, senior director
of AGC's Highway Division. "People just don't like
working at night. They're out of synch, they're tired,
and they're less aware of what's going on around them,
which puts them at risk. Because of this, we're seeing contractors
having a difficult time keeping a work force. Guys will work a night
job occasionally, but when it's job after job, a lot of them
will be looking for some other place to work." Both Deery and
Murphy note that night work often takes its biggest toll on management.
"Sometimes the supervisors are working 14 to 16 hours a day,"
continues Murphy. "They're the first ones in, the last
ones out. They have to coordinate with the day guys to make sure
they have everything they needyou can't pick up the phone
and order a bulldozer in the middle of the night."
Validation for these
insider observations comes from a recent study undertaken by City
College of New York for the New Jersey Department of Transportation
(NJDOT). Researchers interviewed 30 construction workers on four
New Jersey highway construction projects along with a focus group
of additional union laborers. One of the study's most significant
findings was that all of the workers were chronically short of sleep.
The amount of sleep among the study respondents ranged from a minimum
of three hours a night to a maximum of six; 32% reported sleeping
four hours or less and 32% reported six hours. No one reported getting
a full eight hours and most complained about the difficulty of sleeping
during the day when the household is active. The workers interviewed
unanimously agreed that nighttime work had a negative effect on
their body rhythms and all reported that their families reacted
negatively when they worked at night. Seventy-two percent of the
workers interviewed reported working long shifts, 12 hours or more,
and 50% reported they drove two or more hours to work everyday.
Almost everyone in the study said working at night made it difficult
to follow a regular meal schedule and this resulted in poor nutrition.
Only 17% indicated they received additional pay for working at night,
and they all said they'd be willing to forfeit the benefit
in exchange for daytime work.
NJDOT is not the only
organization taking a serious look at night work. Last year AGC
hosted a national conference that brought together industry representatives
to look at work-zone safety. Likewise, the Federal Highway Administration
has a senior working group looking at the same issues. The AGC-hosted
workshop developed some 70 safety recommendations for road and highway
workers, including standardizing the criteria for doing roadwork
at night. The International Union of Operating Engineers is lobbying
for standardized work-zone regulations "with some teeth in
them," including such factors as the use of positive protection
barriers even when the work zone is temporary. "Our goal,"
states a union spokesman, "is a set of basic rules that will
apply to all construction work done at night so contractors don't
have a choice. The direction we're working in is that whatever
standards are developed will be legally enforceable so there's
a level playing field in all states."
And while other organizations
and agencies insist the problem needs study, the International Safety
Equipment Association has committed itself to action, filling in
where the Occupational Safety & Health Administration leaves
off in regulations to protect nighttime workers. "We try to
fill in the gap," comments association spokesman Dan Glucksman.
One result is a standard for retro-reflective clothing the organization
developed with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI-ISEA
107-1999), which stipulates the level of reflectivity of jackets,
vests, and other clothing based on a worker's function and
the conditions under which the equipment will be worn. But while
107-1999 goes further than what the federal government mandates,
it represents a voluntary industry consensus, and as such carries
no enforcement provisions.
Can There Ever Be
Too Much Light?
Despite an increase in
nighttime operations, where traffic is routed around highway construction,
state DOTs provide very little guidance to contractors on how to
establish lighting to improve motorist safety. As Bob Cavan, vice
president and branch manager of Ingersoll-Rand's East Hanover,
NJ, office explains, "Where you have a lot of lighting in one
spota bridge, for instancethe drivers' eyes have
to adjust rapidly to increased and then suddenly decreased conditions."
Motorists need to be especially careful until their eyes have readapted
to the dark. It's not so much a matter of overlighting an area
as it is making sure there's adequate lighting on the perimeter
to allow some accommodation to take place.
"There's no
such thing as too much light," Cavan asserts. "We proved
that at the World Trade Center," where in the wake of the September
11, 2001, disaster, the Office of Emergency Management and officials
from the City of New York asked Ingersoll-Rand to provide emergency
lighting. In fact Cavan's company responded immediately, and
before nightfall, trucks carrying 150 IR LightSource unitsfour
metal-halide bulb self-contained systemshad been dispatched
to Ground Zero where onsite contractors took charge of them and
placed them where needed. "There was always a need for more
light," he says. "After all, the most that could happen
is you turn night into day."
Tips From the Field
 |
To help meet the challenge
of producing quality work at night, Murphy collaborated with NJDOT
to design a system that utilizes equipment-mounted lights. "Unless
you're right in front of them, light towers along the side of the
road don't provide the proper lighting for the work we do,"
stresses Murphy. "Two weeks after we installed the night lighting
system we developed in conjunction with NJDOTand we weren't
even thinking about thisour crews volunteered that they weren't
nearly as tired in the morning. They said it was so bright around
the paving machines it was almost like daylight." All well
and good, says Lockwood, but Allmand Brothers thinks the big issue
in job-site lighting is not just that crews can see to work, but
also safetyworkers have to see and be seen when they're not
in areas directly lighted by equipment. "A guy working away
from a paver," rejoins Lockwood, "is not going to be able
to see if that's the only light on the site. He's liable to end
up in a trench or hole and do some damage."
"When you go out
to light a job, you almost have to create a daytime atmosphere,"
remarks Bodman, "because anytime you use artificial light,
you've got shadows. At Payne and Dolan, we've experimented
with different types of lighting on our equipment, but we also use
portable lighting, which means we're attaching generator systems,
depending on the operation." To keep crews up to speed on night
work, Payne and Dolan holds winter training seminars, including
first aid, traffic control, and equipment maintenance. "Lights
go off at night. Crews have to know how to put their hands together
in the field to fix the equipment and get it working again."
Preplanning Is Crucial
 |
"Construction companies
should develop a detailed reconstruction plan that analyzes a job
for potential hazards for workers and includes specific strategies
for addressing each one of them," cautions Steve Rupard, technical
director for Liberty Mutual Insurance in Boston, MA. "Each
construction job should have a safety plan in place that can be
modified as the job changes. Preplanning is important for signage,
lighting, determining the traffic patterns on and off the site and
within the site itself, for protecting employees from moving equipment
and from traffic, as well as the means by which workers will be
identified on the work site." Among the questions such a plan
needs to address is the use and identification of spotters to manage
traffic and keep workers and equipment separated, whether law enforcement
will available to control public traffic on roadways, how the contractor
will comply with any state lighting standards, and finally job-site
design so workers aren't exposed to traffic crossing from one part
of a job to another. Jeffrey LaBarge, also a Liberty Mutual technical
director, emphasizes that all of this should be specified in a written
safety plan that includes methods for assessing compliance as the
job progresses. "Even though you do a great job of preplanning,
construction projects change frequently," states LaBarge, "so
your safety plan needs to be reviewed on a regular basis. You may
need to replan safety weekly or even daily in some cases, depending
on the circumstances and how the job is going." Both LaBarge
and Rupard emphasize the need for contractors to have experienced
personnel involved in the contract bidding process who are capable
of anticipating what the projects will require to keep workers safe
and how to factor in the cost. Both agree that public law enforcement
is critical to controlling speeds in highway construction zones,
and where states don't provide the service, contractors should be
prepared to arrange their own.
LaBarge and Rupard also
emphasize the effectiveness of Liberty Mutual's Managing Vital
Performance program (MVP), which provides what LaBarge refers to
as "a living document" that contractors can apply to ensure
that employees are performing according to the guidelines established
in the preplanning documents. "If you have a construction site
where crane safety might be one of the crucial factors," explains
LaBarge, "the MVP will identify the key operating functions
that have to be accomplished by the operator to ensure safety. The
observer, whether it be a Liberty Mutual loss professional or someone
on the construction company's crew, uses this document to match
performance with the planning standards to come up with a percent
determination of how safely a specific function is being performed."
(This process also can be accomplished using a portable digital
assistant that generates an immediate assessment of multiple job-site
functions.)
Improved Technology
Manufacturers also are
stepping up to the bat with new equipment to help make the work
zone safer. Preco has developed an object detection system that
uses pulsed radar to detect objects up to 26 ft. out from a vehicle.
"The system puts the emphasis back on the operator," reports
Powell. "The closer the operator gets to an object, lights
flash and a there's a beeping in the cab that gets louder and
faster." Preco also markets a self-discriminating back-up alarm
that adjusts itself to environmental noise levels so workers can
discriminate between multiple alarms sounding at similar volumes.
At least two companies
are marketing video systems to help with rear vision. Safety Vision
Inc. in Houston, TX, which started in the solid waste industry,
now is targeting its rear-vision video camera for construction and
dirtmoving equipment, and Intec Video Systems in Laguna Hills, CA,
which began with closed-circuit surveillance, offers a top-of-the-line,
high-resolution, black-and-white video system that, according to
company spokesman Jon Lovejoy, operates "very clearly"
in almost zero light. "A full moon, a few streetlights in the
area, and you get a good, crisp, high-contrast image. And it's
not just a safety issue. A video system also makes for better efficiency.
You can monitor parts of the equipment that are crucial to your
performance but out of your line of sight, like the level of condition
of a blade on a loader."
Alert and Responsible
"Crews working at
night have to pay particular attention," declares Bodway. "Whatever
you're doing, you have a second job, and that's paying attention
to what's going on around the job site. You are constantly taxing
your mental abilities. At Payne and Doland, we've found it's best
if crews work on the buddy system, which means each individual has
to trust everyone else who's out there with them. As a supervisor,
I spend time out with my crews at night. As I said, it's different
out there, and because of that, we make sure our people attend safety
meetings so everyone understands what they have to wear and use
safety-wise at night and how the equipment they're working on has
to be identified. We've even equipped our crews with lights that
attach to their hardhatssmall flashlightsso they can
see what they're doing if they have to fix something on the machine
or they're checking fluids. These are the kinds of things you adapt
to working at night."
"There are always
issues with employees," observes Murphy, "but as a union
contractor, this is the work we're offering, and the unions
are obligated to send us people who are willing to do what we need
to have done. Sometimes we have problems with guys who have been
with us for many years, but I tell them, No exceptions. Everybody
has to take a turn working at night. That's the way it is.'
We've done things to help people the best we can, specifically
additional salary and wage increases."
The researchers who conducted
the NJDOT/City College study suggested there was no "best"
solution to the problems the workers they interviewed identified
with night work. At best, working on the wrong side of the clock
requires a "complex tradeoff" between the societal benefits
of nighttime work and its impact on those who do it. Suggestions
to help mitigate the effects included a four-day workweek, company-supplied
transportation to and from the work site to minimize the stress
of commuting and provide a few extra hours of sleep, sleeping accommodations
at or near the work site, and standardizing a pay differential for
crews who work at night. (Murphy reports that all his salaried personnel
who work at night receive a 10% pay hike and suggests this could
be applicable across the board, as long as the differential was
adopted as an industry standard and reflects a minimum 10-15% hike
over daytime compensation rates.)
From the loss-control
perspective of the insurance industry, LaBarge and Rupard emphasize
that employers have to step up to the bat when it comes to helping
their crews manage nighttime conditions. "Contractors have
to recognize that, just like anything else, these human-factor issues
have to be managed," points out LaBarge. "If you are a
night superintendent, you have to manage the job to make sure your
workers are on top of what they're doing and that they will
remain that way until the next morning. I've been to many tailgate
or weekly safety meetings early in a project where crews discussed
how to maintain a good diet or how to get enough sleep."
"For years,"
adds Rupard, "field superintendents have been taught to recognize
drug and alcohol abuse. The same thing applies when someone comes
to work tired and sleepy. The idea is to have a plan so you know
what to do if you find yourself with several workers on a project
who obviously are not performing because they're tired."
Where From Here?
One of the most practical
observations to emerge from the NJDOT/City College study was the
need for data on the degree to which workers are at increased risk
at night, the extent to which night work is more cost-effective,
the conditions under which it's economically justified, and
how quality and productivityas well as safetyare affected
when crews work on the wrong side of the clock. "I don't
know what the answer is," admits Deery. "I don't
know that there is an answer. Despite all these problems, night
work is going to continue. In regard to highway work, I think the
state DOTs are going to have to look at why they work at night and
review other options like rerouting traffic and perhaps choose night
work only when it's the last possible option." But as
Murphy points out, traffic and public inconvenience are not the
only incentives for contractors to work at night. As long as construction
work involves a capital investment in machinery, as more and more
projects are put on the fast track, night work will continue to
be a fixture on the construction scene.
Journalist Penelope
Grenoble O'Malley is a frequent contributor to Forester Communications
publications.
|
|